Re: running too much instances of perl in parallel
Mike Tremaine <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.log.logwatch.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ivana Varekova wrote: > Hello, > I just get a bug-report - which complains about the multiple instances > of perl running at one time: > > "I noticed on F10 x86_64 machine that logwatch runs 10 perl instances > and moves my AMD CPU temp to 90 C. > > > I agree with the bug reporter. The number of perl instances especially > for /var/log/messages logfile is huge. So could the number of perl > calls be reduce? > I have two ideas what could be done: > 1/ add the possibility to call shared scripts with several parameters > (logwatch does not need to go through the log file multiple times)and > the number of perl script decrease. > 2/ shared perl scipt transfer to perl procedures - so there will be no > need to call another perl instance. > What is your opinion? Is any of these solutions acceptable for? Or do > you have any other idea how to solve this problem? > Thanks. > Ivana Varekova > _ This comes from these config lines is conf/shared/messages.conf messages.conf:*RemoveService = talkd messages.conf:*RemoveService = telnetd messages.conf:*RemoveService = inetd messages.conf:*RemoveService = nfsd messages.conf:*RemoveService = /sbin/mingetty messages.conf:*RemoveService = netscreen messages.conf:*RemoveService = NetScreen If you re-write this as *RemoveService = (talkd|telnetd|inetd|nfsd|/sbin/mingetty|netscreen|NetScreen) It should work without changes.... However it would be nice if the shared scripts would build that regex for you from a CSV list *RemoveService = talkd,telnetd,etc.... I don't think it would be hard let me take a look. -Mike