Re: Is the logwatch project dying?
Mike Tremaine <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.log.logwatch.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stefan wrote: > Hello list, > > I'm wondering if the logwatch project is slowly dying? Maybe the word 'dying' > is to harsh, but for me it seams at least that the maintainers doesn't care > much about the contributions which are made by outsiders (volunteers). We have > seen some messages to the list in which people ask about what happens with > send in patches. It's the same for me. I send in a couple of patches, nothing > happens. Then I resend the patches and I received at least a confirmation. But > that's all. No commit to CVS or a reply which tells me what's wrong with them. > > I'm not a experienced perl programmer but I can write patches to existing > scripts and I also can write new ones. And I would love to contribute my work, > but how can I if it takes more than half year until patches are accepted (or > rejected)? > > Now my questions: What is the status of the logwatch project? And is work from > outsiders still welcome? > > Finally, let me apologize for my forthright words. > No apologies needed it's a totally fair question. As far as I know I am the only one doing any CVS commits. It has been this way for awhile. I wish I had more time and energy to get all the patches in and all that but the truth is I don't. Every 6 months or so I'll get fired up and try to catch up with the patches, I have them all tagged in my mailbox and all that but at the end of the day I'm one guy who has lots of other things I have to do. How do we fix this? No idea I guess we need new blood. As far as how to get involved well the same way I did back in 2004 start patching against CVS and make it easy to get your patch in. The biggest slow down I have in committing is that patches are not against the CVS tree so I have to go in and figure out where is goes by hand. Then I have to make sure it does not break anything else, remember Logwatch basically works across a wide section of Linux, Solaris, and *BSD installs [heck I can get it to run under IRIX] so we want to make sure your patch is cross platform safe. -Mike