Re: named and DNSSEC

On Sun, 7 Aug 2011 11:46:16 +1000 Frank wrote:
FC> I'm one of the maintainers for the logwatch package for Fedora, and the
FC> person who did a lot to add the DNSSEC messages into the current named
FC> report for logwatch.

Yes, I recognize your name from the bugzilla report I mentioned, and
I've been working on merging our changes into your named script.

FC> I can say that we do want to push those or similar patches upstream (it
FC> is our normal policy) and I'd be interested in the patches you are
FC> currently planning, as we can work together for it.

Ok, great. I'm still testing new patterns. I don't suppose you have
example logfiles from previous BIND releases, so I can make sure I
don't break anything from previous releases?

Another question I had was about messages that appear when the debug
level is turned on. There are quite a few interesting DNSSEC-related
patterns at debug level 3, but there's also a lot of noise which
currently get dumped into the unmatched output... 


Robert

--
Senior Software Engineer
SPARTA (dba Cobham Analytic Solutions)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model 
configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and 
the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free 
download at:  http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev

_______________________________________________
Logwatch-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/logwatch-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk5C4hkACgkQ7/fVLLY1mngokwCfY/+ta+MThDnIiSnh8QcPp4Wk
HzUAoIQrbjmM/CNMYZhfEHKGitHH2kpR
=/vEK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----