Re: logwatch patches

diff against the svn version of the file posted to this devel list usually works. 


-Mike
On Jun 20, 2013, at 2:36 AM, gulikoza wrote:

>> Hi,
>> 
>> note that logwatch on RHEL 5/6 is very old. Also, the services on those
> systems may output their messages slightly differently than the most recent
> versions.
>> You may be patching something that is no longer valid.
>> 
>> --
>> Jan Synacek
>> Software Engineer, Red Hat
> 
> I forgot to mention I'm using a custom rpm (w/ the patches) based on some
> fc19 rpm (svn127 at the time I built it). I have already checked for each of
> the patch that it is valid for current svn.
> The note about the (old) services still applies, but since RHEL6 will be
> supported for some time it's worth it for me. I just thought it'd be useful
> for somebody else as well :-)
> 
> Regards,
> gulikoza
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
> 
> Build for Windows Store.
> 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Logwatch-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/logwatch-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev