Re: new debian patches
"Stefan Jakobs" <[email protected]> Tue, 09 Sep 2014 01:01:14 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.log.logwatch.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2672691.GJJHYRBYXD@nksjako-xps> |
Willi Mann:
> Hi,
>
> I added a few new patches for the latest upload of the debian logwatch
> package. You can find them at:
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/logwatch.git/tree/debian/patches
>
> The patches that are new and I think would be interesting to add are:
>
> 0004-Change-spamassassin-to-use-maillog-config.patch
commited: rev210
> 0005-logfiles-vsftpd.conf-Use-custom-pattern-for-applystd.patch
Default syslog does not print a year. So this would break the filter on many
machines.
> 0007-s-sshd-ignore-PAM-service-sshd-ignoring-max-retries-.patch
commited: rev 211
> 0008-s-s-exim-Fix-wrong-regex.patch
commited: rev 212
> 0009-s-s-sshd-Support-fatal-Write-failed-Connection-reset.patch
commited: rev 213
> 0010-s-s-dovecot-Recognize-and-report-Server-shutting-dow.patch
commited: rev 214
> 0011-s-s-pam_unix-Fix-two-unknown-entries.patch
commited: rev 215
> The patch
>
> 0006-Deb-specific-Print-full-path-to-freshclam-log.patch
>
> is a hack that I think only makes sense on Debian where we know the
> default location of freshclam.log. I think it would be nice if service
> scripts could get the list of logfiles that triggered their invocation,
> but AFAIK this does not exist yet, right?
I have attached a rough patch which makes a space separated list of
logfiles/archives available via LOGWATCH_{LOGFILE,ARCHIVE}_LIST envionment
variable. Do you think this would be usefull?
> thanks
> WM
Regards
Stefan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk