Re: To noatime or not?
LuKreme <kremels-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.macosx.admin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10-Mar-2011, at 09:02, Neil Laubenthal wrote: > > So what's the real deal with atime vs noatime? Having the file modified date changed just because you modified the file has always seemed kinda hokey to me . . .in my view I've always thought that a modification date should reflect the date a file was changed and I've never really considered an access a change . . .although I can also see the argument that one might want to track accesses as well. Er… I have access to atime, ctime, mtime in find <http://www.unix.com/tips-tutorials/20526-mtime-ctime-atime.html> -- Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes