Re: Deduplication (was Re: Recovering from bad disk ...)
Chris Murphy <lists-zXQU9YWDTqjmlV4oE/1sFAC/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.macosx.admin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mar 10, 2011, at 7:54 PM, LuKreme wrote: > On 10-Mar-2011, at 13:05, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> List serves aren't supposed to use Reply-To: > > But that is not true; that is one persons' interpretation of RFC2369, and it is not an interpretation shared by anyone of any relevance (you know, like people who write mail clients, mailing list software, etc. You know, the people who actually matter on this issue). > > RFC2369 doesn't even mention Reply-To aside for using it as an example in the background. It's not in RFC 2369, it's in RFC 2822. Reply-To: is author domain. As mentioned, the author could suggest to the list serve they want Reply-To to be set to the list serve email address. But the listserve can't stomp on everyone's Reply-To unless they have some sort of agreement that the user effectively agrees to this policy, and still comply with RFC 2822. Chris Murphy