Re: Storing Modified Dates - Core Data

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Gerd Knops <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think that description is valid. EOF allowed you to connect to
> main-stream multi-user databases, while (if I understand it correctly)
> CoreData's underlying data store is strictly single user and non concurrent.
> That was quite a disappointment to me first time I looked at it, having
> expected it would be an advanced relative of EOF.

That really has no bearing on the current situation.  Core Data does
post object-did-change notifications; there's no reason Trent can't
listen for those notifications and update his modification date
attribute accordingly.

--Kyle Sluder