Re: When does Carbon completely?
Lothar Scholz <llothar-S0/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.macosx.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Scriptolutions |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Eric, EG> We already know that Carbon is a deprecated technology. What I am now EG> wondering is when does it go the way of "Classic" and become EG> completely unsupported and non-functional? Don't know. Too many API's are still carbon for example the menu system is still implemented in carbon in 10.6. And there are many - and in other parts it's like other have already written just the name for a C level interface. Apple isn't that stupid to force everyone on Cocoa for low level. This would be a dead end even for them. Thats why Grand Central is written in portable C - you might call it carbon. EG> My current thinking is that OS 11 will be the line in the sand (both EG> for 32-bit apps and Carbon). You will need to be Cocoa/Core Foundation EG> & 64-Bit and anything else will just cease to function. There will always be the ability to run 32-bit because for 90% of applications a pure 64-bit mode has only disadvantages. Cache usage is and will always be more important then more internal registers. EG> Well, we're at 10.6 now. Based on past history, it is 18 months EG> between major releases and I figure 10.9 will be the final release EG> before OS 11. So, that is 4 release cycles or 72 months or 6 years. Well i don't see any reason why there shouldn't be a 10.10 or 10.11 I would assume there X is now a fixed trademark and would be very complicated to change this. -- Best regards, Lothar mailto:llothar-S0/[email protected]