Re: Removing an action from a subclass
Christiaan Hofman <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:16:33 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.macosx.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks Panell and Lee. Just the override of respondsToSelector: seems to do exactly what I want. Christiaan On Dec 21, 2010, at 20:02, aglee wrote: > I wouldn't assume nextResponder actually responds to the action message. I think simply overriding respondsToSelector: will be enough. The built-in responder chain mechanism will find the next responder in the chain that does respond to the action message. > > --Andy > > On Dec 21, 2010, at 01:59 PM, John Pannell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Christian- > > Could you implement respondsToSelector: to return NO for your class, and then implement forwardingTargetForSelector: to return the nextResponder in the chain? > > HTH! > > John > > Positive Spin Media > http://www.positivespinmedia.com > > On Dec 21, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote: > >> A view I subclass implements an action that I don't want to support in that view, however I would like the action to be send up the responder chain to the controller object. How can I disable the action in my subclass in such a way that the responder chain does not stop at this view, as if the action method was never implemented? >> thanks, >> Christiaan >> _______________________________________________ >> MacOSX-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-dev > > _______________________________________________ > MacOSX-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-dev > _______________________________________________ > MacOSX-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-dev