Re: Unexpected results w.r.t. exponential operation of LODO (with july2008 release)
Martin Rubey <[email protected]> 31 Aug 2008 12:52:05 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mathematics.axiom.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Liu Xiaojun" <[email protected]> writes: > (1)-> f: INT->INT:=x+->x+1 > > (2) -> K := OREUP ( x, INT, 1, f) Note that this violates the assumptions on sigma and delta - sigma has to be a Ring homomorphism and delta has to be additive and in a certain way compatible with sigma! I guess you wanted something like f: UP(n, INT) -> UP(n, INT) := p +-> p.(n+1) g: UP(n, INT) -> UP(n, INT) := p +-> 0 K := OREUP(E, UP(n, INT), morphism f, g) M := E::K+n Martin