Re: r*r^(k-1) -> r^k / Declaring variable ranges
Gregory Vanuxem <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mathematics.axiom.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1214048124.3532.15.camel@ellipse> |
Le samedi 21 juin 2008 à 00:58 -0400, Bill Page a écrit : > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Gerald Knizia wrote: > > On Thursday 19 June 2008 00:49, you wrote: > >> One easy way is using a rule: [...] > > > > Thank you for your help :]. > > You are welcome. > > > I'm just starting to learn using Axiom. > > Great. axiom-mail is a good place to ask user questions. You might > also want to check: > > http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org > > Actually your question about "declaring variable ranges" has been the > subject of several longer and more detailed discussion in the email > archives under the subject of "indefinities". E.g. > > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-09/msg00549.html > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/axiom-developer/2008-05/msg00062.html > http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org/SandBoxSymbolic > > There have been some proposals, but so far there is not complete > solution to this yet in Axiom. The work of S. Watt and others on "symbolic polynomials" could also be of interest. See for example: http:/http://www.csd.uwo.ca/~watt/pub/reprints/2006-wwca-sympoly.pdf/www.csd.uwo.ca/~watt/pub/reprints/2006-wwca-sympoly.pdf Regards, Greg > > Regards, > Bill Page. > > > _______________________________________________ > Axiom-mail mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-mail >