Maxima for statistics or other topics, was: Maxima by example, volume 2 : Guide to Descriptive Statistics for One-Variable Series
Robert Dodier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mathematics.maxima.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAsY_sTXHVkCPW=eY6xYBcDe3_EFVwY6HXB84UJK5Dv3b4-5pA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 3:12 PM David Kirkby via Maxima-discuss <[email protected]> wrote: > Is Maxima a good tool for statistics? I would have thought R a much better tool for that. For the record, I use Maxima as an all-purpose tool for basic data analysis. Some days that's more symbolic and some days it's more numerical, but it's not necessary to draw a distinct line. For example, one could construct an expression for a statistical function of some values, most of which are numbers but one is a variable, and then study the properties of that as a function of the free variable. I also use Maxima to construct expressions which represent stuff to be computed, and then generate code for other systems -- Python, Matlab, and Swift have all been output targets. I agree that R has a particularly rich package ecosystem, with many very valuable specialized packages. But there's still a lot of stuff which can be handled well by Maxima. best Robert _______________________________________________ Maxima-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maxima-discuss