Re: def-simplifier for variable arity functions?
Raymond Toy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mathematics.maxima.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/26/26 10:54 AM, Stavros Macrakis wrote: > > > There are other nary operators which /should/ be simplifying, namely > *and/or*. Again, my code for that is almost done. > > According to its comments, *def-simplifier *(in *defmfun-check.lisp*) > explicitly does not address the nary case: "the args for the > simplifier only supports a fixed set of required arguments". It would > be nice to fix that. I confess on not looking at the comments. I’ll look into it, but it would really be helpful if I had a simplifier (without using def-simplifier) to look at. Based on the this thread, it looks like we’re mostly looking for things with |&rest| args. So not a simplifier with a finite number of args of which some or all are optional. ​ _______________________________________________ Maxima-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maxima-discuss