Re: 2button, 1op RPN calculator, again
Stavros Macrakis <[email protected]> Tue, 5 May 2026 13:11:43 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mathematics.maxima.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACLVabWP2uN7v7jcKLGv1M7N8dJ+Vh0qrgW3QjC=bOrU46V5yw@mail.gmail.com> |
It has to have some way of entering other inputs if you want to denote anything but constants. Or maybe you pre-push the inputs onto the stack, in general multiple instances of them so that they'll be available at the right place. On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 12:14 PM Henry Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > I just realized that this calculator doesn't have any 'regular' buttons at > all; the only 2 buttons are the parentheses '(' and ')'. > > The '(' button pushes '1' onto the stack; the ')' replaces the top 2 elts > of the stack with the single object eml(x,y), where x,y were the top two > elements of the stack. > > Clearly '(' increments the stack length by 1, while ')' decrements the > stack length by 1, so we have a *parenthesis language*, and only properly > paired parentheses are allowed. > > The stack comes initialized with a single object '1', because *every* > legal computation has to start with a push, and the only constant that can > be pushed onto the stack is a '1', so we needn't bother with that first > push instruction at all ! > > The number of legal instruction sequences of length 2n is Catalan(n) = > binomial(2*n,n)/(n+1). > > This means that the fraction of legal instruction sequences approaches > zero as the length of the sequence grows, so the bit efficiency of ANY > RPN-type representation isn't going to be particularly good. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Maxima-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maxima-discuss > _______________________________________________ Maxima-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maxima-discuss