Help request: Fraenkel term definition

Greg Frascadore <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mathematics.mizar
Message-ID <[email protected]>
 Hello. I am having trouble finding Mizar's definition of the 
 Fraenkel term, and more generally, what definitions are hidden. 

 After reading the scheme axiom at TARSKI:sch 1 and looking around the 
 rest of the MML, I don't understand how the constructor-like notation: 
        { x : P[x] } 
 is defined. It's as if there is an invisible Mizar declaration resembling: 

        func { x : P[x] } means y in it iff ex x st y = x & P[x]; 

 Yet, I don't see it in hidden.miz.  How does one know what definitions 
 are available but hidden? 

 Thanks 
 - Greg Frascadore 


-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Help-request%3A-Fraenkel-term-definition-tp20980174p20980174.html
Sent from the Mizar mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.