Re: vocabularies
Freek Wiedijk <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mathematics.mizar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Josef, >yes; I think something really should be done with the >environment "black magic"; I agree. I also think that given the current Mizar culture, it just won't happen. If even my very modest proposal to integrate the vocabulary files into the articles is seen as a huge problem for maintaining the MML (it isn't!) even bigger changes do not stand any chance of happening. I fear. >perhaps even the "constructors" directive could be made only >optional or removed totally; I especially am always very surprised by the "theorems" directive. Certainly it only needs an utterly trivial pass over the article to find out what should go in there. I often need to run Mizar twice because I forgot to add an article to the theorem directive. That is a serious pain in the you-know-where. Freek