Re: "The QED Project"
Freek Wiedijk <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mathematics.mizar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Josef, Thanks for your interesting comments, which I also forwarded to Arnold. >That is the other attractive and probably very productive >thing about the original idea of Wiki: it is never >"finished" and "stable", and tries to be very friendly to >fresh solutions. I'm not sure I agree with this, not if you are talking about Wikipedia. To me that seems very stable both in its _style_ and in its _look and feel._ The only thing that is being updated all the time is the _content._ And even then you have a whole crowd of Wikipedians breathing down your neck (is that an expression in English?), "stabilizing" what you do. If you take this approach to formal math, it would mean that the _style_ and _look and feel_ of formal mathematics would have to be _very_ stable. Also, the great strength of Wiki is its simplicity. Wiki markup for example is very simple, no? I wish we had this kind of simplicity in the world of formal math... Freek