Re: Seeking description of consistency correctness-condition
Artur Kornilowicz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mathematics.mizar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.GSO.4.61.0910231636180.24272@math> |
Hello, please look at http://markun.cs.shinshu-u.ac.jp/kiso/projects/proofchecker/mizar/skeletons/toc.html In Section '3. Definitions' you can find an answer. Best, Artur On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Greg Frascadore wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm looking for a description of the 'consistency' correctness- > condition and the situations where it is required. Particularly, a > statement of the template formula one must prove to establish consistency. > > After looking through some old papers like 'Muzalewski1993 PCMizar', > and Matuszewski+Rudnicki 'Mizar: the first 30 years', I either couldn't > find it, or only a brief mention that it is required for 'definitions > per cases'. > > Searching the MML, consistency is usually demonstrated simply as: > consistency; (due to disjointness of if/otherwise ?) > > But in the non-trivial cases, the condition being proved isn't > obvious to me. > > Thanks, > > -Greg Frascadore > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Seeking-description-of-consistency-correctness-condition-tp26027415p26027415.html > Sent from the Mizar mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ========================================================================== Artur Kornilowicz e-mail: [email protected] Dept. of Programming and Formal Methods http://math.uwb.edu.pl/~arturk/ Institute of Computer Science tel. +48 (85) 745-7662 University of Bialystok fax. +48 (85) 745-7662 Sosnowa 64, 15-887 Bialystok, Poland