Re: Seeking description of consistency correctness-condition

Artur Kornilowicz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mathematics.mizar
Message-ID <Pine.GSO.4.61.0910231636180.24272@math>
Hello,

please look at

http://markun.cs.shinshu-u.ac.jp/kiso/projects/proofchecker/mizar/skeletons/toc.html

In Section '3. Definitions' you can find an answer.

Best,

Artur



On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Greg Frascadore wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
>  I'm looking for a description of the 'consistency' correctness-
>  condition and the situations where it is required. Particularly, a
>  statement of the template formula one must prove to establish consistency.
>
>  After looking through some old papers like 'Muzalewski1993 PCMizar',
>  and Matuszewski+Rudnicki 'Mizar: the first 30 years', I either couldn't
>  find it, or only a brief mention that it is required for 'definitions
>  per cases'.
>
>  Searching the MML, consistency is usually demonstrated simply as:
>        consistency;    (due to disjointness of if/otherwise ?)
>
>  But in the non-trivial cases, the condition being proved isn't
>  obvious to me.
>
>  Thanks,
>
> -Greg Frascadore
>
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Seeking-description-of-consistency-correctness-condition-tp26027415p26027415.html
> Sent from the Mizar mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>


==========================================================================

Artur Kornilowicz                          e-mail: [email protected]

Dept. of Programming and Formal Methods    http://math.uwb.edu.pl/~arturk/
Institute of Computer Science              tel. +48 (85) 745-7662
University of Bialystok                    fax. +48 (85) 745-7662
Sosnowa 64, 15-887 Bialystok, Poland
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.