Re: reductions in Mizar

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mathematics.mizar
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi:

I am for. If I recall originally "compatibility" was proposed. On the seminar
"reducibility" get stronger support. Mostly of Artur. And because he 
implemented it ...

Regards,
Andrzej


Cytowanie Josef Urban <[email protected]>:

> Hi All,
>
>> registration
>>    let x_1,...,x_n;
>>    reduce term1(x_1,...,x_n) to term2(x_1,...,x_n);
>>    reducibility
>>    proof
>>      thus term1(x_1,...,x_n) = term2(x_1,...,x_n);
>>    end;
>> end;
>
> I never remember the "correctness condition" keywords (coherence,
> compatibility, etc) used in different contexts. I just looked up the
> keyword used for "identify", and it is "compatibility".
>
> Should not there be some unification of these keywords? It seems that
> "reducibility" now proves the same thing for "reduce" as
> "compatibility" does for "identify".
>
> Josef
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.