Urelements?

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mathematics.mizar
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Let me make one thing clear:

we do not propose to chang the foundations of MML. The chang eis rather 
related to type handling.

The (quite old/brand new) TARSKI:1 will be

for x being element holds x is set


It now obvious that 2 is a set, I mean

      2 is set;

is accepted without any references. In new approach it will need 
justification:

      2 is set by TARSKI:1;

I used many times (and it must be revised)

      1-sorted(#1, ... #)

for 1-element 1-sorted. I even wanted to do a revision :-). With new approach
one must write

      1-sorted(#{0}, ...#)

that means the same and it less tricky.

Regards,
Andrzej
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.