Re: Correctness of derivnum(X=1/2,zeta(X),41)

Alessandro Languasco <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mathematics.pari.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dear Georgi Guniski,

> On 26 Sep 2021, at 08:55, Georgi Guninski <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On mathoverflow [1] there is conjecture about the nearest integer to
> [zeta^(k)(1-1/B)]=-B^(k+1)*factorial(k)
> 
> Answer of controversial theoretic result claims the explicit
> numerical counterexample k=41,B=2
> 
> I couldn't compute the counterexample on mpmath with high precision
> due to internal error, 

that is wierd; using python as an interface to mpmath it gives 
languasc@languasc-macmini Desktop % python3 conj.py 70
------ 
precision  70
value =  3.0
languasc@languasc-macmini Desktop % python3 conj.py 80
------ 
precision  80
value =  3.0

The point is that these quantities are large (their order
of magnitude is about 10^62) but their sum is tiny.
So you need to choose a sufficiently large precision 
to perform the computation.

The python-mpmath script I wrote is at the bottom of this file.

An alternative code for gp is the following

? \p100
   realprecision = 115 significant digits (100 digits displayed)
? K=41
%2 = 41
? B=2
%3 = 2 
? round(zetahurwitz(1-1/B,1, K))+B^(K+1)*factorial(K)
%5 = 3.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Best regards
Alessandro Languasco

> but pari agrees the counterexample is correct:
> 
> K=41;B=2;T=derivnum(X=1-1/B,zeta(X),K);(round(T)+B^(K+1)*factorial(K))
> %16 = 3.00....
> 
> Is it plausible that the pari computation is correct with high (what?)
> precision?
> 
> What other CAS say about it?
> 
> [1]: https://mathoverflow.net/questions/404779/on-the-nearest-integer-to-zetak1-1-b-b-ge-2

--------------------------------------------------------------
import sys
defaultprecision = sys.argv[1]
import mpmath as mp

# function z 
def z(s,a,k): 
    y = mp.zeta(s,a,k)
    return y

#  print("Give me the desired accuracy (# of decimal digits): ")
#  defaultprecision = input();
defaultprecision = int(defaultprecision);
#print(defaultprecision);
mp.mp.dps = defaultprecision;
mp.mp.pretty = True

print("------ "); 
print("precision ", defaultprecision);
B=2
K=41
print("value = ", mp.nint(z(1-1/B,1,K))+ mp.power(B,K+1)*mp.fac(K));
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.