Re: 3^k performance

graziano aglietti <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mathematics.pari.devel
Message-ID <CAELohYwnZVAcordq7zej1O=iEPex6ugipvKfQxBn1sc7KOQKAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Bill
" - the powers function has a bug and is very slow for integers."

Which bug?

Thanks
Graziano

Il giorno sab 26 nov 2022 alle ore 09:47 Bill Allombert <
[email protected]> ha scritto:

> On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 08:47:39AM +0100, Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote:
> >
> > A022330_1(n)=1+n+sum(k=1,n,logint(3^k,2))
> >
> > A022330_2(n)=my(t=1);1+n+sum(k=1,n,logint(t*=3,2))
> >
> > ? A022330_1(10^5)
> > cpu time = 8,322 ms, real time = 8,352 ms.
> > %15 = 7924941755
> >
> > ? A022330_2(10^5)
> > cpu time = 215 ms, real time = 217 ms.
> > %16 = 7924941755
> >
> >
> > So about a 40x difference.
> >
> >
> > Is that worthwhile to look into?
> > How to best approach that?
>
> The simplest approach would be to use powers(3,10^5), with to caveat:
> - this would require much more memory.
> - the powers function has a bug and is very slow for integers.
>
> A022330_3(n)=my(t=1,P=powers(3,n+1));1+n+sum(k=1,n,logint(P[k+1],2))
>
> Cheers,
> Bill
>
>

-- 
Graziano Aglietti
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.