Re: interest for PARI/GP Jupyter notebook ?
Edgar Costa <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mathematics.pari.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+iQ7x4QKy3YhRkjt8+wQ6EQwcqg7YE1BaUi_+aoOeEfqiaRDQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Bill, I strongly believe that having a jupyter kernel lows the barrier of entry to almost any language, and thus having one is worthwhile. I am not a regular gp/pari user to help you with this one. I rarely write any gp code, I usually call it from Magma/Sage/Bash. However, whenever I need to write more than one line command, I do it via some jupyter kernel, as I never remember the syntax, and this is a quick way to figure out what works. The Xeus version is quite tempting, as it is much more natural for gp/pari. However, cypari issues should get fixed regardless, as these have broader impacts. Best, Edgar On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 8:41 AM Bill Allombert < [email protected]> wrote: > Dear PARI developpers, > > Some time ago, Jeroen Demeyer has written a PARI jupyter kernel which is > now > maintained mainly by Vincent Delecroix. > <https://github.com/sagemath/pari-jupyter> > this allows to create Jupyter notebook that uses PARI/GP. > > However I do not think Vincent is actually using it, and I know nobody > that really use it, so I do not know how good is the user experience. > > This kernel is based on python and cypari which causes some technical > issues. > > There have been two technically simpler alternatives, one using the GP > binary > directly (by Edgar Costa) and one using Xeus < > https://github.com/jupyter-xeus> > and libpari. > > However before pursuing this further, we need someone that is willing to > use > this kernel for actual applications, giving feedback and willing to test > new > version which compiling and installing them. > > So am I looking for someone interested to help. > > Cheers, > Bill. >