Re: parsum and nbthreads

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 10:27:42PM +0200, Loïc Grenié wrote:
> Le lun. 5 juin 2023 à 17:54, Bill Allombert <
> [email protected]> a écrit :
> 
> > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 03:47:11PM +0200, Loďc Grenié wrote:
> > >     I've pushed a "loic-parsum" to pari git. It does not change the
> > number
> > > of
> > >   threads (I still think it's not optimal right now), however it
> > addresses
> > > most
> > >   of the problems I've illustrated before, should not hurt performance,
> > as
> > > far
> > >   as I can tell, and passes the tests involving parsum (export, parallel,
> > >   programming).
> > >
> > >     The drawback is that it exports one more function (+1 line in
> > paripriv,
> > > and
> > >   +7 non-empty lines in src/functions/programming/parsum) and substitutes
> > >   two functions by a longer one (+14 non-empty lines in
> > > src/language/eval.c).
> > >
> > >        Could you consider it for inclusion, eventually modified?
> >
> > Sure. Do you have some tests where it makes a difference ?
> >
> 
>      Sure.

Applied, thanks!

Cheers,
Bill