Re: The GP command “?”

Bill Allombert <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mathematics.pari.devel
Message-ID <ZXWdJJdm4zzd+XRQ@seventeen>
On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 07:49:50PM -0800, Ilya Zakharevich wrote:
> Are people ACTUALLY using “the sections” in the results of the GP command
>      ?
> ?  Myself, I use only “the tail” of its output.  I do not ever recall
> finding what ?1 outputs useful in the slightest…

The start of the list is more for beginner, the end more for advanced users.

> (However, the output of ?19, ?20, ?21 is quite useful (although	these is
> NOT LISTED in the output of
>       ?

?19, ?20, ?21 list functions that are private to the GP interpreter and cannot
be called normally.

For example,

? _factor_Aurifeuille(5,5)
  ***   syntax error, unexpected invalid token, expecting end of file: _factor_Aurifeuille(5,5)
? _*_(5,5)
  ***   syntax error, unexpected invalid token, expecting end of file: _*_(5,5)

Though it is possible to call them using alias:
? alias("mul","_*_")
? mul(5,5)
%4 = 25
? fold(mul,[1..100])==100!
%5 = 1

Cheers,
Bill.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.