Re: the bug in forprimestep()

On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 12:35:40PM +0100, Karim Belabas wrote:
> Had analyzed this last week (related to initial value being negative
> or becoming negative during the initialization), but hadn't found a
> good way to solve it then. Had another go at it today; the problem
> should be fixed in master now

Millions of thanks!

Can you describe in which contexts this bug is NOT HIT in the old
code — so one can try to squeeze some use from the production builds?

Thanks,
Ilya