On 2025-05-27 13:34, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> K.B.
>>
> Thank you for that approach of using t_COMPLEX (t_POL in Bill's
> approach).
>
> I cannot find a difference in set of minimal residues for both
> normalizations:
>
> $ gp -q
> ? a = 1+4*I; b = 3+2*I;
> ? myround(z) = ceil(real(z)-1/2) + I * ceil(imag(z)-1/2);
> ? S=Set([a - round(a/b)*b |
> r<-[-real(b)..real(b)];i<-[-imag(b)..imag(b)];a<-[r+i*I]]);
> ? myS=Set([a - myround(a/b)*b |
> r<-[-real(b)..real(b)];i<-[-imag(b)..imag(b)];a<-[r+i*I]]);
> ? #S==norml2(b)&&#myS==norml2(b)
> 1
> ? setminus(S,myS)
> []
> ? setminus(myS,S)
> []
> ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Hermann.
>
I found the reason for no difference — real(b) and imag(b) were relative
prime.
If not relative prime, there are differences:
? b*=2
6 + 4*I
? S=Set([a - round(a/b)*b |
r<-[-real(b)..real(b)];i<-[-imag(b)..imag(b)];a<-[r+i*I]]);
? myS=Set([a - myround(a/b)*b |
r<-[-real(b)..real(b)];i<-[-imag(b)..imag(b)];a<-[r+i*I]]);
? #S==norml2(b)&&#myS==norml2(b)
1
? setminus(S,myS)
[-3 - 2*I, -1 - 5*I, 2 - 3*I]
? setminus(myS,S)
[-2 + 3*I, 1 + 5*I, 3 + 2*I]
?
Regards,
Hermann.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.