Question on sending capability through IPC
"Mai, Haohui" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.micro-kernel.l4.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKT8GbsU4DgkJE121q10ZvgeJam6tau=JyQ4657ufpkvKZjiKg@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi,
I'm a little bit confused by how Fiasco.OC sending capabilities through
IPC. Particularly, it seems that one has to pack the capability in message
register, rather than buffer register.
Here is a code sending some capability to the client, which works with
Fiasco.OC:
l4_utcb_t * u = l4_utcb();
l4_utcb_mr_u(u)->mr[0] = ipc_id;
l4_utcb_mr_u(u)->mr[1] = L4_ITEM_MAP;
l4_utcb_mr_u(u)->mr[2] = l4_obj_fpage(cap, 0, L4_FPAGE_RWX).raw;
l4_utcb_br_u(u)->bdr = 0;
tag = l4_msgtag(label, 1, 1, 0);
ipc_call(...);
Notice that the capability is assigned into mr[1] and mr[2], but not br[1]
and br[2].
It seems that this behavior is controlled by the constructor of
L4_snd_item_iter, at kern/l4_buf_iter.cpp:52
explicit L4_snd_item_iter(Utcb const *utcb, unsigned offset)
: _buf(&utcb->values[offset]),
_max(&utcb->values[Utcb::Max_words]) {}
My question is that whether this is the desired behavior? I didn't find any
specification on this.
~Haohui
_______________________________________________
l4-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/mailman/listinfo/l4-hackers