Re: L4Re GUI
Adam Lackorzynski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.micro-kernel.l4.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed Jul 11, 2012 at 17:19:20 +0400, Valery V. Sedletski wrote: > ----- Исходное сообщение ----- > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Valery V. Sedletski > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Robert Campbell wrote: > > > So is this incorrect or just dated? > > http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/pipermail/l4-hackers/2010/004454.html > > Yes, it seems to be incorrect, so must to be in reverse order, as Mag > is more minimalistic, and is a Nitpicker clone, whereas Dope has more > features. (just wait what Adam will say) Both statements are not wrong as there are touching different things. Indeed DOpE has a widget facility which mag does not have. On the other side mag offers a windowing interface which DOpE does not offer as DOpE would be on the client side of that interface. The reason for having both mag and DOpE (and l4con) is that I like to have multiple implementors of the same interface around. In this case all (mag via its plugin) offer the L4Re::Console interface where a client does not need to care who actually implements that. So the server-side can be exchanged without the client noticing. Adam -- Adam [email protected] Lackorzynski http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/~adam/ _______________________________________________ l4-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/mailman/listinfo/l4-hackers