Re: User-level objects
Adam Lackorzynski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.micro-kernel.l4.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
On Sat Dec 06, 2014 at 22:24:20 +0800, li94575 wrote:
> As I know, we can set access permissions for the kernel objects, and
> access to user-level objects is through IPC_Gate.
> So, can I set access permissions for user-level objects through the
> IPC_Gate?
Yes. This is done by giving the appropriate rights flags on mapping. In
Ned's scripting, there are those ':mode("...")' statements (typically
abbreviated with just ':m("...")' or just 'svr()' that define those
permissions. However, bits to be used by user-level implementations are
just the write bit.
> Another question is that If multiple clients need to access a
> particular service object, do they use different IPC_Gate or the same?
Mostly the same IPC-gate but actually both is possible. The purpose of
the IPC-gate is not only to identify the server object but also to
identify the client, or at the least the group of clients. So if you
want to identify a specific client (or a specific group of clients) you
hand them a separate IPC gate. If the server does not care a single
IPC-gate will just be fine.
Adam
--
Adam [email protected]
Lackorzynski http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/~adam/