Re: Question about Fiasco.OC support for SPARC

Adam Lackorzynski <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.micro-kernel.l4.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Dengchao,

On Tue May 10, 2016 at 14:26:55 +0800, [email protected] wrote:
>   I found that the snapshot-2014092821 had already included SPARC-leon support as experimental choice, if I configure "INCLUDE-SPARC=y" to Fiasco kernel, the kernel image can been just built out. But in the snapshot-2015123115, the SPARC experimental choice was been get rid of from Kconfig of Fiasco kernel.

For me it's still there (with INCLUDE_SPARC).

>   I guess the development of SPARC support for Fiasco.OC may have reached a high level, but not finished yet by some reasons. So there maybe has a been-done list and a to-do list to recode the progress of the developement like: "MMU is OK","Interrupt/Exception is to do" ... .

I'm afraid there's no such list.

>   I need to evaluate workload to complete the rest part for running Fiasco.OC on SPARC-leon3. Would you give me some suggestions? Or is there somebody else knows this in more detail?

I'd estimate for someone knowing Sparc in this low-level area this is
fair amount of work, maybe 3 month? But probably also depends on the
workload that should be run.



Adam
-- 
Adam                 [email protected]
  Lackorzynski         http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/~adam/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.