Re: Partitioned Scheduling
Adam Lackorzynski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.micro-kernel.l4.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri Sep 02, 2016 at 20:03:01 +0000, Edinger, Stefan wrote: > How does Fiasco.OC manage its Cores ? > Is it possible to execute more than one SchedContext on a multi-core CPU? Each core runs its own scheduler and the schedulers are independent of each other. Thus they run in parallel and process Schedcontexts on their own. Adam > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Adam Lackorzynski [mailto:[email protected]] > Gesendet: Montag, 29. August 2016 23:03 > An: Edinger, Stefan > Cc: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: Partitioned Scheduling > > Hi, > > On Sun Aug 28, 2016 at 18:17:24 +0000, Edinger, Stefan wrote: > > is it possible to have partitioned scheduling in the way that one can > > use different schedulers for different cpu-cores? > > No, there's just one scheduler in the kernel, for all cores. > However, given that scheduling is core-local only, cores could principally also have different schedulers. > > > And if yes, can I do the mapping from scheduler to core on runtime or > > is it done at compile time? > >