Re: Questions about Fiasco.OC scheduler and L4Linux
Adam Lackorzynski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.micro-kernel.l4.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hey Marc, On Tue Mar 21, 2017 at 08:31:06 +0100, Marc CHALAND wrote: > I'm doing a study to port old software on top of Fiasco.OC. This soft uses > routines which blocks thread scheduling between EnterRegion and LeaveRegion > call. Is there any equivalent on TUDOS ? Did somebody already get this > challenge ? Yes, that's what the vCPU model is basically about, i.e. supporting execution style of an OS. With this you can have EnterRegion and LeaveRegion by disabling/restoring virtual interrupts. > I would like to know if L4Linux uses Fiasco.OC scheduler or a user land one > ? It uses Linux's own scheduler. > For our i.MX7d board, Freescale provides Linux drivers on 4.1. I don't know > yet how many drivers we will need. Do you think it is better to port > drivers from 4.1 to L4Linux 4.3 or later or get a L4Linux 4.1. I have no > idea about the complexity on doing this. With a i.MX7d you have hardware support for virtualization, so what about using that, i.e. running normal Linux in a VM? Getting an L4Linux for an older version is of course possible but a bit of work. Adam