Re: Information on implementing L4
John <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.micro-kernel.l4.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKYQpdsT4zWu++UYFjtrr07HC9DReHAFjKeXvUn8kEdx6=2gaA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 1:00 AM Andrew Warkentin <[email protected]> wrote: > (accidentally replied privately instead of to the list; I really don't > get why "reply to list" isn't usually a thing; it should be the > default when replying to a message from a list) > On 9/13/18, John <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Also, there's not necessarily a performance penalty in CLR because it's > > JIT > > to native code. The CLR isn't actually interpreting bytecode as it goes; > > rather it's compiling the program, storing that compiled program in > > memory, > > and entering the compiled native code. The outcome is the same as > > compiling a language to a native machine language. > > > > It's certainly closer to native code than a pure interpreter in > performance and may be comparable in some situations, but I was pretty > sure that the overall performance was still somewhat weaker, > especially when you're dealing with real-time code. > It's a compiler, the same as gcc. In some situations, equivalent C# and C++ code have compared with the C# program being faster in business logic sections. > > > > > I designed a way for the CLR to self-host: it'd be written in C#, and > > running on itself. This is still theoretical, of course. > > > > I'd think you'd have to statically compile it to native code first. > > You'd have to perform the translation ahead of time and then store the CIL, native, and instrumentation data in an image. When you load the image, it's the same as if a CLR had loaded the original CIL and gotten it JIT'd; except the CLR is the JIT result, and the CIL is the CLR. Runs on itself. > To me, language-based OSes have always seemed interesting but a bit > impractical and limiting. A language-based OS would face more of a > challenge when it comes to success in the real world than a > conventional OS would (that's one reason why I'm writing an advanced > Unix-like OS, since that is what is most likely to be used in the real > world). > The plan is to run a Linux userspace by providing the Linux-specific ABI. _______________________________________________ l4-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/mailman/listinfo/l4-hackers