Re: PowerPC 405

Hi Javier,

I will take a look at what state the code is in tomorrow and hopefully
I'll be able to give something to you soon that you can use as a base.
It will be great having someone to help on this port, and I'm sure I can
help you along the way.

regards,
Carl

On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 12:37 +0200, Javier Cabezas Rodríguez wrote:
> Hi Carl,
> 
> We would be very interested in having access to the current code and
> the design (if any) of the code, so we can start to contribute. Our
> aim is to have a working version of the port as soon as possible.
> 
> Javi
> 
> 2006/7/6, Carl van Schaik <[email protected]>:
> > Hi Javier,
> >
> > I have started a port to PPC405 on the NICTA::Pistachio kernel varient,
> > however due to work commitments, I have not had time yet to complete
> > this port. My aim is to have a port which can support 603 and 405 and
> > possibly other styles of powerpc processors from embedded side through
> > to desktop /server processors.
> >
> > I would be happy to discuss my ideas for the port and might be able to
> > find a way to work with you on this.
> >
> > regards,
> > Carl
> >
> > > Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 01:01:44 +0200
> > > From: " Javier Cabezas Rodr?guez " <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: PowerPC 405
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Message-ID:
> > >       <[email protected]>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I am working with a PPC 405 embedded device and I would like to have
> > > L4 running on it. However, the PowerPC cores supported in Pistachio
> > > are 603 and 750. I don't know if I could reuse some of the code or if
> > > I must start the implementation from scratch. What Pistachio areas, in
> > > your opinion, have to be reimplemented?
> > >
> > > Thank you in advance.
> > >
> >
> >
> 
>