L4_Word_t vs. void*
Joshua Haberman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.micro-kernel.l4.l4ka.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I notice that the L4 headers use L4_Word_t (and never void*) to refer to addresses. Is there a reason why L4_Word_t is a better choice? Should I avoid using void* in my own L4 programs? I imagine there are 32/64 bit issues here (and perhaps even 32-on-64) that I don't fully understand. Can someone enlighten me? Thanks, Josh