question about L4_Set_Timeslice
Ashford Nichols <[email protected]> Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:19:22 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.micro-kernel.l4.l4ka.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPT4yvrjzdqdXBHd8--AQe8gNc2Y_KhkAZa0duhX-x9MkWdrQQ@mail.gmail.com> |
--000e0cd2def615cd2504a76dfec1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In the L4-X2 (revision 7) reference manual as well as in the function definition, the "time slice" is the second parameter, while the "total quantum" is the third parameter. However, it appears that adjusting the second parameter affects the "total quantum", rather than the time slice, and likewise adjusting the third parameter affects the "time slice", rather than the total quantum. This is observation is based on thread behavior as well as information given by the kernel debugger (option 't'). So is this a bug or is it that I just don't understand how this works? -- Ashford --000e0cd2def615cd2504a76dfec1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In the L4-X2 (revision 7) reference manual as well as in the function defin= ition, the "time slice" is the second parameter, while the "= total quantum" is the third parameter. However, it appears that adjust= ing the second parameter affects the "total quantum", rather than= the time slice, and likewise adjusting the third parameter affects the &qu= ot;time slice", rather than the total quantum. This is observation is = based on thread behavior as well as information given by the kernel debugge= r (option 't'). So is this a bug or is it that I just don't und= erstand how this works?<div> <br></div><div>--</div><div>Ashford</div> --000e0cd2def615cd2504a76dfec1--