Re: Fwd: Wall Street article on a new Cooperative
"Matt Asay" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>David wrote: >>And speaking of trust, I trust these greedy, shortsons of >>bitches about as far as I can throw them. They are *not* operating in >>the public interest, even by accident. I disagree. One of Adam Smith's central arguments, and one that seems to bear itself out in practice, is that you just don't have to trust any subset of human/corporate interest. You trust in the checks and balances that exist in the web of a myriad of conflicting self-interest. (That is, you trust in the overall balance of self-interest.) The real problem is when someone (like Microsoft) breaks through the clutter of atomized self-interest to impose Self-Interest. That is, centralization of interest in one party. Avalanche, whatever it may become, is at the moment a great check on Microsoft (and Novell, and Red Hat, and any other company that hopes to exercise control over customers to boost margins). We should be grateful for every new, robust form of self-interest because it adds one more restraint to the pile that tends toward centralization over time. As for the Sherman Antitrust Act, it is designed to prevent collusion in pursuit of the restraint of trade. I don't see this in Avalanche, just as I don't see it in the vast majority of partnerships and alliances companies have long forged between themselves to co-develop products. Perhaps it may come to that, but Avalanche today does not fit the antitrust bill. If anything, it fosters a potential check on the Microsoft monopoly. As for the critique (made by others) that Avalanche does nothing for open source, how so? Why is it any less open source because it is restricted to a smaller group of participants than most open source projects, a restriction largely dictated by our voraciously hungry legal system? We should be hoping Avalanche will succeed, regardless of whether we directly share in its benefits as members of the co-op, no matter that it doesn't fit our established view of what open source "should" be. It's about time our industry innovated its business models. Matt