Re: Charging the Charger

At 07:24 PM 4/11/2005, Joe Corneli wrote:
>Seriously, I think it would be a much better idea to design a
>"parameter space" than a license.  All crazy ideas are welcome in that
>phase.

Here we agree. A parameter space with modifiable assumptions and the 
ability to project forward in time probably is a better description of what 
we're doing.

As to the "we" this also includes a colleague Goeff Parker who is a co-PI 
on an NSF grant IIS-0338662.  There's also a discussion group dedicated to 
this topic specifically at the Creative Commons (cc-bizcom) but there's 
been no traffic there lately.  Been better discussion here!

>... and solicit more feedback from the community then.  At least we should
>have a glimpse of how the model is going to work.  If you've already
>posted links about this, then my apologies for going back over old
>material.  (And that's two reasons in one email why I prefer wikis to
>mailing lists in general.)

Yep, first discussion on this group was Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:10:35 -0500 
under title "Re: Epistemology of FS ".  I'll cross post the original CC 
announcement from end of last summer in the next message.

MVA