Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
"A. Pagaltzis" <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Apr 2005 03:30:16 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20050419013016.GA15175@klangraum> |
* Ben Laurie <[email protected]> [2005-04-18 05:05]: > What's always seemed to me to the best way to do this is to > combine the two approaches. That is, party A wants bug B fixed > and invites tenders to do so, then chooses one. > > The forward bounty approach seems to me to drive the market > towards the cheapest (rather than the best) fix and certainly I > rarely, if ever, see a bounty that even vaguely approaches the > kind of money that would give me incentive to do the work. But wouldn’t your combined scenario above have the exact same effect? Say the company asks for a bug to be fixed and 10 developers write offers. Who’s the company going to pick: the most expensive offer, or the cheapest one? Regards, -- Aristotle