Re: Software as a public service
Alan Hudson <[email protected]> Thu, 12 May 2005 14:38:24 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Russell McOrmond wrote: > Alan Hudson wrote: > > It is funny: when it is software we don't hesitate to run test cases, > but when it is policy we seem paralyzed. If you want to know what the > results of an ATiP request is for software, then run a test case. The > worst case is that your test case may fail and you'll then have a > core-dump to take to your government representative. > In the source files we hand over to government we've already put a license agreement at the top(typically LGPL, but sometimes BSD if asked). So if you got a faxed copy of this code back, would you have to follow that license agreement? Typically its just going to say: (c) Blah, Inc 1997 - All rights reserved. Ie no real license, just a statement of all rights reserved. I don't see how having a copy of this source will be of use for future programming. Fine for information/compatibility(good step), but not for software usage.