Re: Charging the Charger [was: GPL v3 public performance idea?]
Laurent GUERBY <[email protected]> Sun, 15 May 2005 02:00:15 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 17:06 -0400, Marshall W. Van Alstyne wrote: > Yes, delays to bug fixes are significant. I think access to the source is > important for this reason. [...] When you said of in-house "This doesn't scale nearly as well as selling packaged solutions", it can be reversed, what big IT consumers (those who spend 90% of the money that goes in programmer pockets) want is high quality support and customization, and "packaged solutions" doesn't "scale" at all here since government granted monopolies provide a disincentive to do so. > [...] I'll concede that Gates too often uses the invisible hand of the market to > pick consumers' pockets, but even so, he must have done something > right. Market shares of Word, Excel, PPT, and Windows are remarkably high... Well two big antitrust bodies said that Microsoft behaviour was illegal abuse of monopoly power, so I won't go further. > [...] As a rule, I find it really hard to find an economic justification for > software patents. [...] IP lawyers do have a justification :) Laurent