Re: Software as a public service
Russell McOrmond <[email protected]> Mon, 16 May 2005 12:38:02 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > This is what is so damn frustrating about the economics of software. There are a lot of things frustrating about the economics of software, and the fact that it is not exactly like anything else is one of them. > "Everybody knows" that software is intangible and non-scarce, and that > OSS is just plain The Right Thing. But economic analysis says that's > a contradiction---OSS leads to market failure. While if you assume > that software is tangible and scarce, then you _can_ get the result > that IP doesn't give the incentives that it claims to give. Let me explore a different direction. When looking at why peer production works great for things like software, but not so great for things like entertainment, I have tried to come up with language for things which have value "for what they do" and other things which have value "for what they are". Software is valuable because it is used to accomplish some task, and accomplishing that task has value. Software provides more value as it accomplishes more tasks, not as it exists in some larger number of copies. (I'm not talking about network effects here, where software can be said to be anti-rivalrous) In the sense of the word scarce you are talking about there being a higher demand for software to do various tasks than the supply of (and knowledge of) existing software to accomplish these tasks. Once the software to accomplish a specific task "exists" it can then accomplish that same task for anyone any number of times without any additional cost. It is in this latter sense, not the former, that people suggest that software isn't scarce. This is very different than oil which "exists" (and we are aware of its existence and value to us), but where the amount of the *same thing* is in limited supply. With non-rivalrous goods there is no natural scarcity in the number of the same thing, even if there is a scarcity of the existence of a required thing. Is there economic terminology that separates these two different types of scarcity? -- Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/> http://www.digital-copyright.ca/blog/2 (My BLOG) Sign the Petition Users' Rights! http://digital-copyright.ca/petition/ To protect Internet age creativity we must reform WIPO, not copyright!