Re: Charging the Charger
Joe Corneli <[email protected]> Mon, 16 May 2005 19:38:02 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Franklin's reasoning was 1) I already have enough money, and I'm retired Most people I know want more money (including me, but I do try to exercise some self-restraint, and trust me, once you get started down that path, its relatively easy going), and most people are not retired. 2) I want to maximize the benefit of the lightning rod, franklin stove, armonica, etc. to the entire world. Mnay people seem to think similar things, but their ideas about how to maximize the benefits of whatever _they_ are capable of creating will tend to vary. Sometimes they haven't actually created anything but they still want to collect paychecks while they are in the process of maybe-creating something. Sometimes they believe that doing the best to help their company maximize profits will be best for the world. And there are a lot of other ways of thinking about this service-to-the-world stuff, too. I'm not necessarily going to argue (why bother). But I can imagine designing simple simulations that might prove that if everyone thought _like Franklin_ about this stuff, things would be going better than if everyone thought _like Gates_ (etc. -- if I knew more history I would cite a founding father instead... my sense is that Jefferson would have been a pro-IP guy, but who knows). Of course, maybe I'd be surprised, and it would turn out that strong IP really was "better" -- or maybe it depends on a set of parameters; sometimes one way is better, sometimes the other way is better. 3) It's the 'right' thing to do. This is actually a somewhat convincing argument, at least it seems to be for a lotta folks. 4) It's more fun this way. An even more convincing argument for me, personally. 5) It increases my fame. Sure. Look, we're still freakin' talking about ol' Ben _right now_. (No, not _that_ ol' Ben.) and (perhaps most important of all) 6) The chicks really dig it. Yeah, shucks. :) So, items 3-5 here seem like things people might believe or might not, different people will have different ideas about 2, 6 could be tested empirically. 1 seems rather "special". Anyway, I imagine it wouldn't be _too_ hard to use things like this as the basis of a kinda fakey model or 10 that would compare free vs non-free and give us something to think about. But presumably people have made many versions of this little model already? I indeed believe that Franklin was a significant contributor to the open source world. It's us, once again, who are catching up with the First American. Where was that prophesy... oh here it is: "The old shall be made new."