RE: Charging the Charger
"Anderson, Kelly" <[email protected]> Tue, 17 May 2005 16:49:27 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I beg to differ... but just a little bit. Proprietary software does enjoy AN advantage when it comes to support. And that is that the licensing fees from selling the software can initially bootstrap the support organization. There is no such source of bootstrapping capital for a support organization to support, say Open Office, other than perhaps by going public as RedHat did, or doing a round of VC funding. In either case, it's much more difficult to have a pure support organization. -Kelly -----Original Message----- From: Joe Corneli [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 10:38 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Charging the Charger I would add, of course, supported software, with documentation and training as necessary... :-) Sure, and, also of course, there could be a division of labor here, whether the sw was proprietary or not. (Its not as if hacker-written and/or free software was inherently at a disadvantage in these dimensions.) E-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Sender is not liable for any loss or damage arising from this message. The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.