RE: HBS WK: Who will win Microsoft or Linux?
"Anderson, Kelly" <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:38:23 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stephen, I'm not disagreeing with you, I just don't understand what you mean precisely by "countervailing influence" below. Could you elaborate a little please? I had an additional insight on my Horizontal-Vertical model, that aside from the Horizontal hot bed of open source activity, and the Vertical hot bed of open source activity, that there is also a hot spot in Programming Tools... which doesn't fit neatly into the model I presented the other day. Who says the cobbler's kids don't get shoes? :-) There may be other hot spots of open source activity that I am missing here... Parenthetically, I would classify infrastructure sorts of things as Horizontal, after all everyone uses TCP/IP... -Kelly -----Original Message----- From: Stephen J. Turnbull [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 9:38 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: HBS WK: Who will win Microsoft or Linux? Kelly> If a piece of software is too widely appealing, like word Kelly> processors, Operating systems, web browsers, etc., then it Kelly> is a prime candidate for a widely supported open source Kelly> effort. If it is too vertical, (as in CRM, payroll, the Kelly> sorts of things that Perot Systems, PeopleSoft and the like Kelly> go after) then large companies will pay people to work on Kelly> open source efforts to increase the bottom line elsewhere. I think there's a lot to what you say, but especially for the "very horizontal" class the size of demand is a countervailing influence. Although many software firms, especially Microsoft, are known for trying to crush their competition, that doesn't mean that there isn't substantial profit to be made by getting to the market earlier with a better product, then getting out later, if and when the market gets commoditized. (Shapiro and Varian call this the "3M strategy".) E-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Sender is not liable for any loss or damage arising from this message. The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.