Re: Chapter on Open Source in Friedman's _The World is Flat_
Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Russell McOrmond wrote: > Looked, but couldn't find that chapter online. Maybe he'll be interested > to put it up on a WIKI somewhere to get the best feedback. Idea passed along (which'll satisfy Russ Nelson's similar reasonable request), we'll see what happens. > Only suggestion I have (not having read it) is to ensure that some of the > stuff that is happening at WSIS and WIPO (Development Agenda) with the > majority-world countries realizing the power of peer production and the > benefits for them vs "knowledge manufacturing" and "software manufacturing" > that represents a trade deficit for every country but the USA. This is why > the USTR/USPTO is fighting to hard internationally to impose protectionist > rules to protect incumbents from competing models/etc (software and other > information process patents, interface copyrights, legal protection for TPMs > that falsely claim to protect copyright, government programs that use > "royalties collected" and "number of patents" as metrics, etc). > > While there is quite a bit of movement with companies and governments > adopting FLOSS, including more and more support companies, I believe that > mentioning what the incumbents and their government sponsors are doing to > fight is interesting. DMCA, software patent directive in the EU, ineffective > anti-trust remedies that exclude FLOSS, etc... He spends two pages talking about patents; that patents act as a barrier to collaboration, particularly across international lines, and that laws passed to "protect IP" need to not be so onerous as to prevent such collaboration. He says "the free-software person in all of us wants no patents", which is probably an unfair characterization but he uses it to denote one end of a spectrum of considerations. And he does describe it in the context of vested interests vs. upstart competitors. Brian