Re: support for a small US college going GNU?
"Karsten M. Self" <[email protected]> Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:24:39 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20050716212439.GB26538@localhost> |
--OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable on Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:10:35AM -0500, Joe Corneli ([email protected]= =2Eedu) wrote: >=20 > I've been corresponding a little with the new CIO of my "alma mater" > (New College of Florida, a small public "liberal arts" school in > Sarasota) about switching the college over to GNU/Linux. It seems > iffy, but if whole governments can do it, I think a small, liberal, > college ought to be able to achieve the same thing. Furthermore, I > think the issue of security should cinch the argument. But the CIO, > Erich Matola, points out that switching architectures would require > funding. Presumably this is true; does anyone have an idea about the > actual numbers here? Are there people out there who can get in a bid > that would blow MS/Apple out of the water? Nothing specific, though I've had similar questions myself. I worked for a while with a non-profit which was the victim^Wbeneficiary of Microsoft bribes^Wlargess, in the form of a $100m 5 year grant. Actually, that broke down to some $88m "worth" of software and materials (some of the training and course guides were actually useful), and $12m in actual cash. That last being distributed over some 3000 locations over five years works out to about $800 per location per year. Significantly less than the cost of rooting out viruses and spyware even at reduced rates.... The experience did suggest though that a deal, even if only nominal dollars were involved (say: 2500 desktops of RH / SuSE "valued" at $200 per =3D=3D $1m), might smooth the ruffled feathers of administrators and politicos otherwise having to answer to why they "left all the Microsoft money on the table". Add in some real value -- professional services, support, a few servers -- and you've got the makings of something which might actually fly from both the grantor and grantee perspective. IBM's the obvious source of this, should they be willing. One problem was trying to figure out how to approach them on this sort of matter. The other thing to keep in mind is that any migration should be phased. IBM's got a pretty sane Redbook for desktop GNU/Linux migrations: http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/sg246380.= html?Open 1. Make the case. Identify current problem areas with campus IT services, proposed Free Software solutions, and likely benefits. Keep in mind disadvantages as well. 2. Start with specific apps (on 'Doze boxes) which can be cross-platform, services and servers, and technical / limited use desktops. 3. Identify migration hurdles. AD, calendar apps, financial apps, and single-platform applications are the most difficult to move. AD can largely be addressed by LDAP, though the situation is more rough-and-tumble. =20 =20 Multiple web-based calendaring applications exist and are the likely best option. Several of these are very popular among academic institutions, including one product now marketed by Oracle, the Oracle Collaboration Suite. Single-platform applications, usually either financial apps or domain specific (e.g.: student management, instructor gradebook, library cataloging) are a special case and should be supported in place and/or transitioned independently. 4. Try to change one thing at a time. Transitioning first to cross-platform apps, *then* to another platform, means that you can iron out the application wrinkles first, and the OS issues later. =20 There's a school of thought which says you want to minimize the duration of change for any given user group, in which case, it's best to make a set of transitions (apps, OS, etc.) together, rather than spreading the pain over a period of months. Using a phased transition with 6/9/12 month steps, it should be possible to minimize impact points and match them to the academic calendar, preferably scheduling changes to commit at the onset of breaks rather than, say, at the beginning of the academic year, with all that that entails. Start too, with a small group of technically adept users likely to welcome the change. CS or other technical departments are probably your best bet here. 4. Have a way out. There are various ways in which to trial applications and configurations. =20 =20 Remote access means you can support GNU/Linux configurations over XDMCP, VNC, or similar techniques. =20 =20 Legacy MS Windows also offers remote access options, though with very little of the flexibilty offered by GNU/Linux. Tools such as rdesktop and VNC can allow as-needed access to an MS Windows box, and possibly Windows Terminal Services (WTS). Another option is virtualization software such as Xen and VMWare. The former actually runs on base hardware, partitioning it amongst several guest OSs. VMWare can run in server (base HW) or workstation (user-space application) mode. Both allow access to multiple environments and configurations. While not ideal, for users with legitimate needs to multiple operating environments, they're powerful tools. 5. Examine your successes and failures and update the transition plan accordingly Peace. --=20 Karsten M. Self <[email protected]> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety most likely voted for Bush. - Slashdot sig. --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC2XsXefG8443k044RAlKiAJ4kZ4h4cCpFxOT3sACdM5H/EBpXaACeIrqi KGK1Fa5Gw4R2abWRVSvsHD0= =/9w9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1--