Hypothetical Business Plan
"Anderson, Kelly" <[email protected]> Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:05:48 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
=0D=0ASuppose that I want to host Wikis. I write open source software (or=0D= =0Aperhaps semi-open source software) to create the Wiki. As long as the=0D= =0Acontent is freely accessible to all, then using the Wiki is free=0D=0A(p= erhaps within certain limits of space and bandwidth) and I sell=0D=0Aadvert= ising to pay for that part of the hosting business just like=0D=0AGoogle an= d Geocities.=0D=0A=0D=0ANow suppose that some people want to use the Wiki t= o communicate within=0D=0Aa group. Their Wiki is password protected. For th= is priviledge, I want=0D=0Ato charge a monthly fee. Another way to make thi= ngs easy for people and=0D=0Amaybe make a buck or two.=0D=0A=0D=0ASo far, s= o good, but the question is how to discourage other people from=0D=0Adoing = the same, and reducing the potential profitability of my hosting=0D=0Abusin= ess=3F=0D=0A=0D=0AI could put a proprietary version of the software on my s= erver that=0D=0Aadded the security features. I'm not sure that's allowed un= der a lot of=0D=0Aopen source licenses, but it is for my "personal" use, ev= en if it's=0D=0Ahosted on a web server that everyone can access. Does that = work under=0D=0Athe GPL conditions of changing code for your own internal p= ersonal use=0D=0Aas long as it isn't distributed or sold=3F=0D=0A=0D=0AI kn= ow I couldn't keep anyone from changing the code themselves to add=0D=0Apas= sword protection on their own servers, at least under any OSI=0D=0Aapproved= license. Anyone who wants to go to that extent is more than=0D=0Awelcome t= o do so. But could I protect that feature by saying, "If you=0D=0Awant to a= dd that feature, you're going to have to fork the project and=0D=0Agive it = a new name. I'm not adding it to Project X."=3F=0D=0A=0D=0AIs this viable=3F= In keeping with the spirit of open source=3F I welcome=0D=0Ayour suggestio= ns as to whether this is workable under the GPL, and any=0D=0Aalternative m= echanism to keep the feature out of the main GPL code.=0D=0A=0D=0AI appreci= ate the vibrant discussion on this list, and await the slapping=0D=0Aof fis= h anxiously. :-)=0D=0A=0D=0A-Kelly=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A= E-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By rea= ding the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full re= sponsibility for taking protective action against such code. Sender is not = liable for any loss or damage arising from this message.=0D=0A=0D=0AThe inf= ormation in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It i= s intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone els= e is unauthorized.=0D=0A